juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Does Hammock + Juneau make sense?
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:12:42 GMT
Inherently, the OSGi approach doesn't make sense for uber-jar based
microservices, which is the most popular pattern.  You're not deploying
something on top of an existing container, you're spinning up something new
independently.

John

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:29 PM Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:24 PM, James Bognar
> <james.bognar@salesforce.com> wrote:
> > The build scripts already produce OSGi bundles in addition to a single
> > juneau-all.jar file for non-OSGi apps.  So converting it to OSGi
> shouldn't
> > be difficult.
> >
> > Anyone know if there are any difficulties developing OSGi while using
> Maven?
>
> AllI can tell you is the URL of the Apache Felix Maven Bundle Plugin:
>
>
> http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-maven-bundle-plugin-bnd.html
>
> Sorry,
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
> --
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
>
>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message