juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Juneau Project Bootstrap
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:50:02 GMT
It's definitely a matter of preference. How about a vote?


On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, James Bognar
<james.bognar@salesforce.com> wrote:
> My $.02.
>
> Using GitHub Issues sounds appealing.  But something feels strange about
> using GitHub for bugs but not SCM.
>
> I'm leaning slightly towards using GitHub Issues.  GitHub seems to be
> taking over the world.  But I don't feel strongly about it since I'm really
> unfamiliar with either right now.  I'll be okay with whatever the community
> decides.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
> Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Juneau Project Bootstrap
> To: private@juneau.incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com>, "craig.russell@oracle.com" <
> craig.russell@oracle.com>, Craig Chaney <cchaney@salesforce.com>, "John D.
> Ament" <johndament@apache.org>, James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com>,
> david.goddard@uk.ibm.com, Brian Laskey <blaskey@us.ibm.com>, Min Idzelis <
> midzelis@salesforce.com>
>
>
> Let's continue this discussion on dev@juneau.incubator.apache.org. (you can
> sign up before you have signed ICLA and get @apache.org address)
>
> On 28 Jun 2016 6:46 a.m., "Jochen Wiedmann" <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>> Speaking of tools, can we continue developing on GitHub and then push
>>> commits over in batch to the Apache Git for releases?
>>>
>>> I see on the incubator page that there is an entry for using JIRA, which
>>> is a commercially licensed product and a direct competitor to the product
>>> in which this library was originally developed. Is using that really
>>> required or can we continue with GitHub issues as well?
>>>
>>> AFAIK, Infra is still only supporting ASF Git as the primary repository,
>> and Git as a mirror. I believe, this is, what John requested.
>>
>> I think, this means, that you will be required to download pull requests
>> from GitHub as a file before applying them. However, that inconvenience
>> should be acceptable, IMO.
>>
>> As an exception from that rule. I have read, just yesterday, that it
>> should now be acceptable, if Juneau decides *not* to use the ASF Jira for
>> bug reports, and use GitHub issues instead. My personal impression is, that
>> this wouldn't really be an advantage, because tool support for Jira is much
>> better than for Github. OTOH, GitHub might be more attractive for users.
>>
>> Again, John should be able to tell about details.
>>
>> Jochen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
>>
>>
>> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> James Bognar



-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

Mime
View raw message