juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: Juneau Project Bootstrap
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:51:42 GMT
My vote:

[0] - No preference either way.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's definitely a matter of preference. How about a vote?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, James Bognar
> <james.bognar@salesforce.com> wrote:
> > My $.02.
> >
> > Using GitHub Issues sounds appealing.  But something feels strange about
> > using GitHub for bugs but not SCM.
> >
> > I'm leaning slightly towards using GitHub Issues.  GitHub seems to be
> > taking over the world.  But I don't feel strongly about it since I'm
> really
> > unfamiliar with either right now.  I'll be okay with whatever the
> community
> > decides.
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
> > Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: Juneau Project Bootstrap
> > To: private@juneau.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com>, "craig.russell@oracle.com" <
> > craig.russell@oracle.com>, Craig Chaney <cchaney@salesforce.com>, "John
> D.
> > Ament" <johndament@apache.org>, James Bognar <
> james.bognar@salesforce.com>,
> > david.goddard@uk.ibm.com, Brian Laskey <blaskey@us.ibm.com>, Min
> Idzelis <
> > midzelis@salesforce.com>
> >
> >
> > Let's continue this discussion on dev@juneau.incubator.apache.org. (you
> can
> > sign up before you have signed ICLA and get @apache.org address)
> >
> > On 28 Jun 2016 6:46 a.m., "Jochen Wiedmann" <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello.
> >>> Speaking of tools, can we continue developing on GitHub and then push
> >>> commits over in batch to the Apache Git for releases?
> >>>
> >>> I see on the incubator page that there is an entry for using JIRA,
> which
> >>> is a commercially licensed product and a direct competitor to the
> product
> >>> in which this library was originally developed. Is using that really
> >>> required or can we continue with GitHub issues as well?
> >>>
> >>> AFAIK, Infra is still only supporting ASF Git as the primary
> repository,
> >> and Git as a mirror. I believe, this is, what John requested.
> >>
> >> I think, this means, that you will be required to download pull requests
> >> from GitHub as a file before applying them. However, that inconvenience
> >> should be acceptable, IMO.
> >>
> >> As an exception from that rule. I have read, just yesterday, that it
> >> should now be acceptable, if Juneau decides *not* to use the ASF Jira
> for
> >> bug reports, and use GitHub issues instead. My personal impression is,
> that
> >> this wouldn't really be an advantage, because tool support for Jira is
> much
> >> better than for Github. OTOH, GitHub might be more attractive for users.
> >>
> >> Again, John should be able to tell about details.
> >>
> >> Jochen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Bognar
>
>
>
> --
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
>
>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>



-- 
James Bognar

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message