juneau-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com>
Subject Fwd: Juneau Project Bootstrap
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:14 GMT
My $.02.

Using GitHub Issues sounds appealing.  But something feels strange about
using GitHub for bugs but not SCM.

I'm leaning slightly towards using GitHub Issues.  GitHub seems to be
taking over the world.  But I don't feel strongly about it since I'm really
unfamiliar with either right now.  I'll be okay with whatever the community
decides.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: Juneau Project Bootstrap
To: private@juneau.incubator.apache.org
Cc: Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com>, "craig.russell@oracle.com" <
craig.russell@oracle.com>, Craig Chaney <cchaney@salesforce.com>, "John D.
Ament" <johndament@apache.org>, James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com>,
david.goddard@uk.ibm.com, Brian Laskey <blaskey@us.ibm.com>, Min Idzelis <
midzelis@salesforce.com>


Let's continue this discussion on dev@juneau.incubator.apache.org. (you can
sign up before you have signed ICLA and get @apache.org address)

On 28 Jun 2016 6:46 a.m., "Jochen Wiedmann" <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Peter Haumer <phaumer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> Speaking of tools, can we continue developing on GitHub and then push
>> commits over in batch to the Apache Git for releases?
>>
>> I see on the incubator page that there is an entry for using JIRA, which
>> is a commercially licensed product and a direct competitor to the product
>> in which this library was originally developed. Is using that really
>> required or can we continue with GitHub issues as well?
>>
>> AFAIK, Infra is still only supporting ASF Git as the primary repository,
> and Git as a mirror. I believe, this is, what John requested.
>
> I think, this means, that you will be required to download pull requests
> from GitHub as a file before applying them. However, that inconvenience
> should be acceptable, IMO.
>
> As an exception from that rule. I have read, just yesterday, that it
> should now be acceptable, if Juneau decides *not* to use the ASF Jira for
> bug reports, and use GitHub issues instead. My personal impression is, that
> this wouldn't really be an advantage, because tool support for Jira is much
> better than for Github. OTOH, GitHub might be more attractive for users.
>
> Again, John should be able to tell about details.
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
>
> --
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
>
>
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
>
>


-- 
James Bognar

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message