incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Goson zhang <gosonzh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.8.0-incubating RC2
Date Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:55:54 GMT
Hi @Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com> :

Regarding the version of berkeleydb, see if the LICENSE description is OK
[1]?

Oracle mentioned in the Oracle Berkeley DB Licensing Information that the
dual license agreement adopted by their components.

We choose to use this component under Apache V2 protocol, at the same time,
from the LICENSE file of the source code package of 7.3.7, it is the Apache
V2 LICENSE.

1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-tubemq/pull/425

Thanks!

Goson zhang <gosonzhang@apache.org> 于2021年2月11日周四 上午10:10写道:

> Hi Xiangdong:
>
> This place is indeed worth exploring: why do some software carry a binary
> license, and some do not, what are the considerations for this? I mainly
> refer to the components of Kafka, Pulsar, and Kylin.
>
> It would be great if anyone can answer!
>
> This berkeleydb-je is quite special: we use the version that follows
> Apache V2, but the authorization schemes used by different versions are
> different, we must specifically list the problem so that users can treat it
> clearly.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月10日周三 下午3:16写道:
>
>> Hi, xiangdong
>>  thanks for helping review our project
>> > But if you read your Readme.md, you will find..
>> Yes indeed. If you have used `mvn clean package`, then using `mvn compile`
>> won't
>> be a problem.  We will go through the readme file and figure out how to
>> reorg the steps.
>>
>> > Others:
>> Thanks, we will check our license and make sure our project has the right
>> license clarification. We're still learning the apache way :)
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:48 PM Xiangdong Huang <sainthxd@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > We've found that maybe you were using `mvn compile` to build the
>> tubemq
>> > > project, in this case, the project may not be built successfully.
>> >
>> > But if you read your Readme.md, you will find `mvn compile` command...
>> So
>> > it should be fixed.
>> >
>> > Others:
>> >
>> > - Seems all Readme.md files have no Apache-rat.
>> > - I am not sure whether I am right: many projects have a LICENSE-binary
>> > file that list all 3rd part dependencies... e.g., hadoop [1] and IoTDB
>> [2],
>> > but TubeMQ only lists license files from all modified/copied source
>> files.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/LICENSE-binary
>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > -----------------------------------
>> > Xiangdong Huang
>> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
>> >
>> >  黄向东
>> > 清华大学 软件学院
>> >
>> >
>> > Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月8日周一 下午10:31写道:
>> >
>> > > Hi Justin
>> > >     We've found that maybe you were using `mvn compile` to build the
>> > tubemq
>> > > project, in this case, the project may not be built successfully.
>> > >     This project has some plugins executed in phase `package`, `mvn
>> clean
>> > > package` seems to work well. Could you please try the command and
>> > >     check whether it works as expected.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:57 PM Goson zhang <gosonzhang@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >  Thanks, professional and meticulous!!
>> > > >
>> > > > We'll check carefully again.
>> > > >
>> > > > Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月8日周一
上午10:25写道:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi, Justin
>> > > > >   Thanks for your check.
>> > > > >   I'll try to find out why you cannot compile. We will send a
new
>> > > > > pending-release source for you to review before we start a new
>> thread
>> > > for
>> > > > > voting. Is that ok with you?
>> > > > >   Thanks again for guiding our project.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message