incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Goson zhang <gosonzh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.8.0-incubating RC2
Date Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:51:43 GMT
Hi @Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>  and all:

Regarding the LICENSE issue of berkeleydb binary package:

In this case, can we choose to use it in accordance with the Apache V2
protocol?

We should have discussed this issue [1], and in August 2020, I sent an
email to berkeleydb-info_us@oracle.com in accordance with the requirements
of [2] to clarify my question, but it not responded to me. And the LICENSE
of we choosed 7.3.7 berkeleydb,  is licensed under Apache V2 license.

1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5166446dcabcba0ff9db65d9aa13f4b0b60751f03dfba8f65475bc8e%40%3Cprivate.tubemq.apache.org%3E
2.
https://www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/berkeleydb-downloads.html

Thanks!


Goson zhang <gosonzhang@apache.org> 于2021年2月11日周四 上午10:55写道:

> Hi @Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com> :
>
> Regarding the version of berkeleydb, see if the LICENSE description is OK
> [1]?
>
> Oracle mentioned in the Oracle Berkeley DB Licensing Information that the
> dual license agreement adopted by their components.
>
> We choose to use this component under Apache V2 protocol, at the same
> time, from the LICENSE file of the source code package of 7.3.7, it is the
> Apache V2 LICENSE.
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-tubemq/pull/425
>
> Thanks!
>
> Goson zhang <gosonzhang@apache.org> 于2021年2月11日周四 上午10:10写道:
>
>> Hi Xiangdong:
>>
>> This place is indeed worth exploring: why do some software carry a binary
>> license, and some do not, what are the considerations for this? I mainly
>> refer to the components of Kafka, Pulsar, and Kylin.
>>
>> It would be great if anyone can answer!
>>
>> This berkeleydb-je is quite special: we use the version that follows
>> Apache V2, but the authorization schemes used by different versions are
>> different, we must specifically list the problem so that users can treat it
>> clearly.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月10日周三 下午3:16写道:
>>
>>> Hi, xiangdong
>>>  thanks for helping review our project
>>> > But if you read your Readme.md, you will find..
>>> Yes indeed. If you have used `mvn clean package`, then using `mvn
>>> compile`
>>> won't
>>> be a problem.  We will go through the readme file and figure out how to
>>> reorg the steps.
>>>
>>> > Others:
>>> Thanks, we will check our license and make sure our project has the right
>>> license clarification. We're still learning the apache way :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:48 PM Xiangdong Huang <sainthxd@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > > We've found that maybe you were using `mvn compile` to build the
>>> tubemq
>>> > > project, in this case, the project may not be built successfully.
>>> >
>>> > But if you read your Readme.md, you will find `mvn compile` command...
>>> So
>>> > it should be fixed.
>>> >
>>> > Others:
>>> >
>>> > - Seems all Readme.md files have no Apache-rat.
>>> > - I am not sure whether I am right: many projects have a LICENSE-binary
>>> > file that list all 3rd part dependencies... e.g., hadoop [1] and IoTDB
>>> [2],
>>> > but TubeMQ only lists license files from all modified/copied source
>>> files.
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/LICENSE-binary
>>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > -----------------------------------
>>> > Xiangdong Huang
>>> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
>>> >
>>> >  黄向东
>>> > 清华大学 软件学院
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月8日周一 下午10:31写道:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Justin
>>> > >     We've found that maybe you were using `mvn compile` to build the
>>> > tubemq
>>> > > project, in this case, the project may not be built successfully.
>>> > >     This project has some plugins executed in phase `package`, `mvn
>>> clean
>>> > > package` seems to work well. Could you please try the command and
>>> > >     check whether it works as expected.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:57 PM Goson zhang <gosonzhang@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > >  Thanks, professional and meticulous!!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We'll check carefully again.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Yuanbo Liu <liuyuanbo92@gmail.com> 于2021年2月8日周一
上午10:25写道:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi, Justin
>>> > > > >   Thanks for your check.
>>> > > > >   I'll try to find out why you cannot compile. We will send
a new
>>> > > > > pending-release source for you to review before we start
a new
>>> thread
>>> > > for
>>> > > > > voting. Is that ok with you?
>>> > > > >   Thanks again for guiding our project.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message