incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.5.0-incubating RC0
Date Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:15:06 GMT
Hi,

+1 (binding)

However if it wasn’t for the Incubating WIP disclaimer I would be -1.

The LICENSE issues where brought up last time [1] It is best if some work is done to improve
each release so it better than the last. Please ask your mentors to help with this.

I checked:
- incubating in names.
- signature and hashes correct.
- LICENSE incorrectly list dependancies rather than what is bundled in the release.
- LICENSE don’t list point to full license text so is unlikely yo comply with 3rd party
license terms.
- NOTICE is very likely missing information from other Apache license NOTICE files, but with
all dependancies included it’s hard to know for sure.
- All files have ASF headers
- Failed to compile from source

I didn’t check the binary artefacts.

It would be interesting to know where these come from [2] and how they were licensed.

More concerning is why teh build is failing wth this:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project tubemq-all: Could not resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.tubemq:tubemq-all:pom:0.5.0-incubating: Could not find artifact org.apache.tubemq:tubemq-server:tar.gz:bin:0.5.0-incubating
in berkeleydb-je (https://download.dcache.org/nexus/repository/berkeleydb-je/) -> [Help
1]

Why does the source release depend on the binary one?

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r875e3e1abe41369611e7c0c6610ac29af35c552cddc3088e4df3f99c%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
2. ./resources/assets/public/css/fonts/icon.*



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message