Hi Justin,
Quick clarification on the logos comment
> - logos of other companies on front page
IIUC you want us to remove the logos. Correct?
Thanks
Vinoth
On 2020/05/12 14:46:30, Vinoth Chandar <vinoth@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks, as always, for the great feedback!
>
> On the PMC, the folks listed fall into at-least one of the following categories
>
> - Actively (multiple times a week) taking part in the project. All our newly added PMCs
through graduation and majority of original PPMC are currently in this category
> - Mentors who have helped significantly through the incubation process, teaching us
the Apache way
> - Members of the original PPMC, who may not be very active now, but chose to stay on.
These were early adopters/champions for the project. Like you mentioned, the rationale is
to allow them the chance to become active again (at-least 1 PMC member cited this specific
reason to stay on, On the flip side, we do have 1 PPMC member, 1 inactive mentor who chose
to step down and are not part of this list).
>
> On the issue of the "person who has been recently added", if this is a mentor, we needed
additional mentors, we began a VOTE, but did not follow through, since one of the other mentors
suggested apache processes did not require it. Happy to follow up on private@, if thats deemed
more appropriate.
>
> On the committers,
>
> - Of the top 15 contributors [1], 10 of them are already committers. (Not to say this
is the only metric). We have a well-documented criteria [2]
> - We are and will be glad to offer committership to strong contributors. PPMC sends
out appreciation emails to such contributors showing strong trajectory and we have such a
healthy pipeline working towards committership.
>
> We will get the logos/download page link fixed.
>
> On the 3rd party branding issues cited, both of them are pre-incubation references to
the project when hosted on Uber's github account. One of them is a Spark summit talk delivered
by 2 current PMC members (incl me) and ondataengineering.net looks like a 3rd party writing
a tech summary on the then Uber OSS project. Since then, Uber has done due process to transfer
ownership to the ASF (blog here [3]). Since we incubated, we have consistently used Apache
branding in any/all external materials. Please let us know if we are missing something.
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/graphs/contributors?from=2016-12-11&to=2020-05-12&type=a
> [2] https://hudi.apache.org/community.html#become-a-committer
> [3] https://eng.uber.com/apache-hudi/
>
>
> On 2020/05/12 10:50:06, leesf <leesf0315@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 to graduate Hudi, it is a nice community and deserve graduating.
> >
> > Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com> 于2020年5月12日周二 上午11:58写道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > Why having inactive PMC members is not a big deal now? What's the point
> > > of
> > > > keeping them if they r inactive and do nothing or have no interest in
the
> > > > project?
> > >
> > > At some point in the future that may become active again or they may plan
> > > to be more active in the near future. Having a few extra people on the PMC
> > > doesn’t hurt a project if they are inactive.
> > >
> > > > There is an inactive IPMC member on the proposed PMC - who didn't
> > > > have time, or bandwidth to help in any way on the project but yet chose
> > > to
> > > > be part of and expressed his intent to be on the proposed PMC.
> > >
> > > I would suggest the project discusses it with them.
> > >
> > > BTW I also agree Mentors shouldn't automatically become part of the new
> > > PMC if they did not help.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|