incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal
Date Fri, 07 Feb 2020 22:06:56 GMT
Looks like the discussion is winding down a bit. So, to sum it up:

- CC shall be removed during code transfer to ASF
- an SGA will be expected from DataLingvo
- as the original NLPCraft developers from DataLingvo are all a part of
   NLPCraft project there is no need for explicit copyright transfer
   permission from them (or at least this is how I understand the

Anything else I haven't covered (sorry, the thread was a bit of 
asynchronous and I might have missed some points).


On 2/5/20 6:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>> NLPCraft came originally from DataLingvo.
> OK so that clarifies that there is code developed by DataLingvo in this code base.
>> During migration, some DataLingvo artefacts weren't properly
>> renamed (it should be fixed by now).
> I would question why they were “renamed”, while you’re not an ASF project yet please
see [1] for future expectations. ASF policy is generally to not remove 3rd party headers.
>> Just to be clear - NLPCraft has no
>> affiliation with DataLingvo of any kind (beyond the original roots) nor it
>> is a legal entity; it's just a project name.
> You mentioned all the original developers from DataLingvo worked on NLPCraft. Is this
still the case? Are any of them initial committers? Will all people who worked on the original
DataLingvo code base be signing ICLAs?
>> If required, DataLingvo will execute SGA (as it already open-sourced it
>> with ASL 2.0 license two years ago). Please advise.
> I think that would be best.
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 1.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message