incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper
Date Sun, 09 Feb 2020 13:35:02 GMT
Great ... :-)

really looking forward to finally having this resolved AND the maven-wrapper itself as part
of the Maven project.
Guess after releasing that as apache once and updating the maven-wrapper scripts accordingly
we can finally get rid of some of the controversial bits in our releases.

Chris

Am 09.02.20, 13:12 schrieb "Robert Scholte" <rfscholte@apache.org>:

    I've updated incubator page[1].
    
    Do we still need a vote to complete the process? 
    
    There was already an agreement on maven-wrapper, there was only discussion about the maven-wrapper-plugin,
which has been removed from the page.
    
    thanks,
    Robert
    
    [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-wrapper.html
    
    On 7-2-2020 20:06:19, Robert Scholte <rfscholte@apache.org> wrote:
    After sharing the information with the Maven PMC, we want to do the following:
    
    - accept Maven wrapper. 
    - don't wait for Walmart to hand over a SGA for the wrapper-plugin. Instead we will start
to write our own maven-wrapper-plugin. This is actually a very small plugin, won't require
a lot of effort to get it running.
    
    thanks,
    Robert
    On 4-2-2020 19:28:03, Robert Scholte <rfscholte@apache.org> wrote:
    Thanks John, I'll share this with the PMC and we'll let you now what we'll decide.
    
    Robert
    On 4-2-2020 17:07:31, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
    To be very explicit here:
    
    - The code for the maven wrapper is fine, it's already apache licensed and
    has no NOTICE file declared with it, so would be perfectly fine to import.
    ICLA's would be nice, but not required, and adding a NOTICE indicating the
    origination of parts of it would also be nice but not required.
    - The code for the Takari Maven Plugin is EPLv1 and requires an SGA to
    change the license to apache license.
    
    I'd recommend the Maven PMC take this back and decide if importing just the
    wrapper is enough.
    
    John
    
    On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:20 PM Brian Fox wrote:
    
    > I do not have answers to those questions, which seems like good ones.
    > I just wanted to break the loop, which I think I might have ;-)
    >
    > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:13 PM David Nalley wrote:
    > >
    > > My sense from reading this thread is that it was a 'work-for-hire' and
    > > that the contributors are not owners. Otherwise, why have they been
    > > bothering to talk to Walmart Labs? Why is a company (as opposed to
    > > project or indivudal(s)) listed as the copyright holder in source
    > > code?
    > >
    > > The copyright headers identify Takari Inc as the copyright
    > > holder/owner, which from this thread seems to have been acquired by
    > > Walmart Labs?
    > >
    > > --David
    > >
    > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:01 PM Brian Fox wrote:
    > > >
    > > > I think what Robert is highlighting was that collectively, the
    > > > contributors are still owners and have granted permission to use
    > > > another license.
    > > >
    > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:59 PM David Nalley wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean <>
    > justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > HI,
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I agree with what John wrote, part of the code is EPL which is
not
    > compatible with the ALv2, you need the owner permission to change the
    > license on that..
    > > > > >
    > > > > > My understanding of "Let me try to get in contact with Walmart
    > Labs to get an SGA for the Takari Maven Wrapper.” was that the next step
    > would be an SGA.
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > I agree with Justin.
    > > > >
    > > > > The lack of an SGA makes this ineligible for the normal lazy
    > consensus route.
    > > > > The fact that 1 of the chunks of code you're looking at is licensed
    > > > > under the EPL is a further blocker. You can't relicense it without
    > > > > explicit permission from the owner, preferably memorialized as a SGA.
    > > > >
    > > > > While I don't think that the IP Clearance process is perfectly rigid,
    > > > > it is a process and this one is missing some significant parts of
    > that
    > > > > process.
    > > > >
    > > > > --David
    > > > >
    > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    > > >
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    > >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    >
    >
    

Mime
View raw message