incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.7.0 (incubating) based on RC3
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:14:25 GMT
Hi Luciano,

I've fixed the license version manually, they'll be solved in next RC cut.
But still I cannot find out the license for ldapsdk 4.1, this is a very old
library, I doubt there's no license existed. Would you please help to check
it? Thanks!

And regarding to bootstrap and them files, they do existed in binary distro
as a part of Livy Server.

Thanks
Saisai

Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> 于2020年1月3日周五 上午6:11写道:

> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:43 AM Saisai Shao <sai.sai.shao@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The Livy PPMC has voted to release Livy 0.7.0 RC3 as the next Livy
> release.
> >
> > Livy enables programmatic, fault-tolerant, multi-tenant submission of
> > Spark jobs from web/mobile apps (no Spark client needed). So, multiple
> > users can interact with your Spark cluster concurrently and reliably.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ce78a69fb17b7ae1a04a51cb13949c4f726d03c43c6ebde8bbd0272f%40%3Cdev.livy.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Result thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d030023995e4323c32e8ee68de99e48cb4f20761d5ff784ff2aac558%40%3Cdev.livy.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The RC is based on tag v0.7.0-incubating-rc3:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/commit/0cc431a7e9236e313f9904ef121cad5df444d4da
> >
> > The release files can be found here:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/livy/0.7.0-incubating-rc3/
> >
> > The staged maven artifacts can be found here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelivy-1012
> >
> > The list of resolved JIRAs in this release can be found here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/versions/12345179
> >
> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks!
>
> While looking into the binary distribution, it looks like the
> third-party file might have been generated and has more files that
> actually the ones being distributed, but my bigger issue is with a
> list of dependencies with unknown licenses.
>
> Unknown license:
>
>     * ASM Core (asm:asm:3.1 - http://asm.objectweb.org/asm/)
>     * Antlr 3.4 Runtime (org.antlr:antlr-runtime:3.4 -
> http://www.antlr.org)
>     * Java Transaction API (javax.transaction:jta:1.1 -
> http://java.sun.com/products/jta)
>     * Jettison (org.codehaus.jettison:jettison:1.1 - no url defined)
>     * commons-beanutils (commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils:1.7.0 -
> no url defined)
>     * jsp-api (javax.servlet:jsp-api:2.0 - no url defined)
>     * ldapsdk (ldapsdk:ldapsdk:4.1 - no url defined)
>     * oro (oro:oro:2.0.8 - no url defined)
>     * servlet-api (javax.servlet:servlet-api:2.5 - no url defined)
>     * transaction-api (javax.transaction:transaction-api:1.1 - no url
> defined)
>     * zookeeper (org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper:3.4.6 - no url defined)
>
> Also, the main license lists dependencies (e.g. bootstrap and related
> theme files) that I believe is only in source distro.
>
> I would feel more comfortable approving the release after this is
> sorted out, or making this a source release only.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message