incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gian Merlino <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Druid (incubating) as a TLP
Date Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:07:41 GMT
Hi all,

Just wondering if anyone has anything else to add to this discussion.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:22 AM Gian Merlino <> wrote:

> Hey Justin,
> Thanks for your comments.
> The other repos under contain projects
> loosely affiliated with Apache Druid but that are not seen as part of the
> core project. Some of them have ongoing discussions about whether the
> community wants to migrate them to Apache (as sub projects, maybe, or as
> part of Apache Druid proper) or perhaps sunset them. I expect these
> conversations to continue after graduation.
> On the topic of branding, the PPMC is definitely aware of its
> responsibilities in that area. Internally we have updated our own project
> site branding, and externally we've reached out in a few cases already to
> ask for the Apache Druid name to be used correctly and to clarify the
> independent nature of the project. We hadn't reached out before about the
> two specific documents you mentioned, but I just did a few minutes ago.
> On the topic of committers and PPMC members, from my POV the reason for
> adding a bunch of committers at once was that once we started thinking
> about adding more, a variety of names came up at once. I think in the
> future we’ll likely invite additional people in a more typical manner.
> We’ve recently invited all active committers to join the initial PMC slate,
> and I expect we’d continue a policy of having an inclusive PMC.
> Your point on committer merit as it relates to noncode contributions is
> noted. It is something that we should keep an open mind on.
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:33 PM Justin Mclean <>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a couple of questions/observations:
>> What the situation/status of the repositories under
>> A quick google search turns up some branding/trademark issues e.g. [1][2]
>> is the PPMC aware of this?
>> Have the trademark issues been resolved?
>> I note you added a number of committers but no PPMC members. Why is this?
>> Is also seems that all these people were added at the same time, which
>> seems a little unusual. I’m curious to why was it done that way.
>> A recent discussion seems to imply that only people who commit code are
>> considered for committership. You might want to reconsider that.
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> 1.
>> 2.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message