incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0
Date Sat, 18 May 2019 15:45:59 GMT
the fact people allow tools like apache RAT to rot, yet somehow can
find glitches in dozens of repos tells me priorities are whacked.

For example, the last release justin found a second header on a file
that said it was temporary (now deleted)

did he manually look at hundreds of files to see that? If not, why are
the tools we are supposed to use hamstrung? A correct optimization is
empowering projects to succeed on their own. RAT is a part of that.
Why are there better tools not available? Why is a second license a
"ISSUE" that needs to be discussed in consideration of whether a vote
is 3+1 days or 3+3 days. The bias is towards making things problems,
not putting them in perspective or addressing long held issues that
make this whole thing eggshell (ex RAT)

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 5:33 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan@apache.org> wrote:
>
> In defence of Justin :-) I'm very sure NetBeans would not be as solid and
> well placed in Apache right now, outside the Incubator, without Justin's
> uncanny ability to find glitches. :-)
>
> Gj
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:59 PM Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > maybe you can open source the tools you use justin.
> >
> > you seem uncanny ability to find glitches, yet also have an ability to
> > ignore note in the vote request mentioning known issues.
> >
> > start helping instead of finding faults. you are the reason incubator is
> > not something anyone wants to go through
> >
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019, 3:20 PM Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > But for Zipkin,  there are lots of community releases which are built
> > > > on top of auto tools,  so I think it's much safer for us to start a
> > > > parallel vote both PPMC and IPMC.
> > >
> > > Given all release I’ve looked at had license (or other) issues why do you
> > > think that the “auto tools” are doing what is required and that there is
> > a
> > > requirement for doing this? Or why do you feel you need to get releases
> > out
> > > before they comply with ASF policy? You'll allow note that issues pointed
> > > out with previous releases still occur in later releases and that’s
> > > probably an issue you need to look into.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message