incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Podling PPMC members and mentors not signed up to private lists
Date Sat, 11 May 2019 09:38:34 GMT
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:43 AM sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 09:00, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:33 AM sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 02:59, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:36 AM Justin Mclean <
> justin@classsoftware.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >...
> > > >
> > > > > No one should be subscribed to the private list other than mentors,
> > > PPMC
> > > > > members and ASF members (who can subscribe to any private  list).
> > > >
> > > > Strictly speaking, a (P)PMC may have invited guests subscribed to
> their
> > > > private@ list. This is quite unusual, but has some precedent. As you
> > > note:
> > > > all subscriptions to private@ should be reviewed/moderated.
> > >
> > > Do such invites need to be recorded somehow?
> > >
> >
> > I don't see why they should. A community invites a person to their
> private@
> > list.
>
> But how does the community decide to invite the person?
> I would expect such decisions to be recorded on a mailing list.
>

I've seen the discussion on a private@ list, and then the invite went out.
So, sure: it's on a list.

Again: not typical ... it's been too long for me to remember which list we
did this on :)

Might be possible to find subscribers to private@FOO that have no obvious
connection to the FOO PMC.

> That person subscribes, the moderator allows. Done. It isn't really a
> > significant action.
>
> IMO allowing access to a private list is a significant act.
>

Po-tay-toe, po-tah-toe ... situational. I don't find it too significant,
but also understand that's just me.

Cheers,
-g

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message