incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Draft incubator report
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2019 20:22:44 GMT
Cool.  I think we've generated some consensus, even if we haven't answered
every question.  To summarize, I'd like to change this paragraph of the
report:

"Again a reminder to all incubating projects and mentors that all releases
made available to the general public need to be approved by the PPMC and
IPMC. This includes docker, githubb, PyPi, npm and any other platform for
publishing releases, and also covers release candidates. If in doubt please
ask your mentors or on the incubator general list."

To this:

"A reminder to all incubating projects and mentors that all releases
and distributions advertised to the general public need to be approved by
the PPMC and IPMC. This includes docker, github, PyPi, npm and any
other platform for publishing releases, and also covers release candidates.
Nightly builds for project-internal use clearly marked as "snapshot" or
"prerelease" (or similar) can be made available to project contributors. If
in doubt please ask your mentors or on the incubator general list."

Objections?

Best Regards,
Myrle


On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:34 PM Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 5, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/5/2019 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>> As long as these are not available to the general public all is fine.
> [1]
> >>> s/available/advertised/
> >> Thanks that’s a better way of putting it. Obviously any published
> artefact is available to the general public if and when they discover it.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Justin.  The advertised vs available was a big concern for me
> > when I read that this morning.
>
> Yes, that is better, but here is the next challenge. For distribution
> channels like Maven, NPM, etc which some projects use to stage prospective
> releases how do we recommend that projects stay within the available, but
> not advertised rule? I think somewhere some guidance is needed. Recently on
> legal-discuss there is a long thread [1] which discusses binary channels.
> Perhaps some guidance can be pulled from that thread.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d578819f1afa6b8fb697ea72083e0fb05e43938a23d6e7bb804069b8@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d578819f1afa6b8fb697ea72083e0fb05e43938a23d6e7bb804069b8@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message