incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:48:51 GMT
+1. That distinction is important. The ASF, and our projects, release source code.

> On Oct 25, 2018, at 6:39 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Those are "convenience binaries" ... not "binary releases".
> 
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:25 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> While I agree that binary artifacts are for convenience purposes, if one
>> searches  our dist folder they will find lots of projects with binary
>> releases.
>> 
>> When reviewing binary archives we need to make sure that the license file
>> is updated with the shiped dependencies licenses appropriately and that
>> they are all compatible with the Apache License (notice file might also
>> need to be updated).
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:38 Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> ...
>>> 
>>>> As a reviewer, how am I to vote on this release candidate?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You do NOT vote on binary artifacts. Since you cannot release binaries,
>> you
>>> should not put the Foundation's imprimatur on those artifacts (and as PMC
>>> Member, that is what your vote represents).
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Should I vote -1 because the RC contains binaries?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Vote on the source artifacts only. Clarify that your vote does not apply
>> to
>>> the binaries.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> -g
>>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my Mobile device
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message