incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2
Date Sun, 01 Apr 2018 08:14:04 GMT
Yes but as said we can fix in next release cycle. It's more an improvement than a blocker IMHO.

Regards
JB

Le 1 avr. 2018 à 10:10, à 10:10, Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com> a écrit:
>Hi Olivier
>
>NOTICE file is not supposed to include the copyright unless the License
>requires.
>As the MIT License already has the copyright statement, we don't need
>to
>specify it in the NOTCE file.
>
>I just copy the Justin's comments from the lega issue discussion[1] ,
>it
>can explain lots of thing.
>
>"While including all of NOTICE is the safest/simplest way.
>
>INAL but I also think removal of obvious things that have been
>documented
>that shouldn't be there is also safe. i.e.
>
>  - Don't include ASF duplicate ASF copyright/this product developed at
>   the ASF lines [1]
>- Remove anything that should be in LICENSE (that is already there)
>i.e.
>   MIT and BSD license information [2]
>   - Remove any copyright lines from MIT and BSD (but not ASL 2.0)
>permissive licenses, who headers are still in place in their respective
>   files [3]
>   - Only include parts if they are bundled in your release [4]
>
>Perhaps also politely ask / provide a patch to the upstream project to
>fix
>their NOTICE file?
>
>1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
>2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
>3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle"
>
>[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-262
>
>
>Willem Jiang
>
>Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>          http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
>Twitter: willemjiang
>Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> the content is simply.
>> "
>>
>> Apache Gobblin
>>
>> Copyright 2017-2018 The Apache Software Foundation
>>
>>
>> This product includes software developed at
>>
>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>
>>
>> This product includes Bootstrap
>>
>> Copyright (c) 2011-2015 Twitter, Inc.
>>
>>
>> This product includes the Glyphicons Halflings icon set
>>
>> Copyright (c) Jan Kovařík (http://glyphicons.com)
>>
>> Licensed under The MIT License (MIT) as a part of the Bootstrap
>project.
>>
>>
>> This product includes normalize.css
>>
>> Copyright (c) Nicolas Gallagher and Jonathan Neal
>> "
>> Can you please explain what is the legal problem with such content?
>> TBH I can see so many similar content in a lot of TLP projects. So
>why we
>> should be more rude here than for other projects?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 at 09:08, Justin Mclean <justinmclean@me.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > -1 binding as NOTICE should not contain copyrights of bundled 3rd
>party
>> > software. The NOTICE file needs to only contain what is required 
>(and
>> not
>> > already in LICENSE) and needs to be as small as possible as it
>affects
>> > downstream projects. [2]
>> >
>> > I checked:
>> > - incubating in name
>> > - signatures and hashes good
>> > - DISCLAIMER exists
>> > - LICENSE is missing info for fonts [1]
>> > - NOTICE is incorrect
>> > - Some .sh files are missing ASF headers
>> > - Can compile from source
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Justin
>> >
>> > 1.
>> > apache-gobblin-incubating-sources-0.12.0/gobblin-admin/
>> src/main/resources/static/fonts/*
>> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message