incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Absent mentors
Date Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:05:27 GMT
+1 for taking consideration of release vote.
It's quite important process of the podling.


Willem Jiang

Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
          http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think the problem is serious. I also think that signoff rate is a
> better
> > metric in practice than it seems it would be.
>
> That problem is indeed pretty serious and also pretty chronic.
>
> As for the metric -- I really think that using mentor turnout on release
> voting threads will serve us well.
>
> > Adding the additional metric seems like a small step that could help.
> >
> > Being aggressive about removing non-mentors is a very good idea. It is
> best
> > if mentors remove themselves, but it is imperative that the incubator
> has a
> > realistic idea about how many mentors there really are.
>
> Big +1 on the above. Perhaps if we:
>    1. get a clear indication on release vote turnout (as part of
> Incubator report)
>    2. add to it the sign-off turnout
>
> We can start at least nagging unresponsive mentors to begin
> with and if behaviour doesn't improve -- suggest that podlings
> start looking for a replacement.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message