Hi Bertrand,
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:20 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I apologize for coming late to this discussion, but longstanding policy
>> is to accept either SGA or CCLA that identifies the contribution to the
>> satisfaction of the contributor....
>
> So IIUC this means you agree with the way this has been handled?
I agree with accepting Intel's CCLA/grant for "Felix" and proceeding with IP Clearance.
I agree with the conclusion that Intel's explicit grant for "Felix" as identified on Schedule
B of the CCLA provides sufficient coverage for us to remove Intel's copyright statements on
the code donated to Felix.
>
> I'm asking just to make sure the archives of this thread provide a
> very clear answer,
> in case we have similar situations in the future.
I hope that this thread will inform future situations where a CCLA/SGA is descriptive but
not extremely detailed.
Craig
>
> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|