incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <>
Subject Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in
Date Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:20:50 GMT
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Mark Thomas <> wrote:
> On 07/06/17 17:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sean Busbey <> wrote:
>>> On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament <>
>>>>> While these are all great discussion points, I don't believe they're
>>>>> relevant to incubator only and probably should have remained on the
>>>>> legal-discuss list.  Ignite graduated ~2 years ago.  The incubator probably
>>>>> doesn't have an opinion about this, but it's good to know that the policy
>>>>> may change (and I do personally have an opinion on said types of software).
>>>> The reason I'm bringing it on the IPMC mailing list has nothing to do
>>>> with how long
>>>> ago Ignite graduated and everything to do with the following two points:
>>>>    1. It can be very useful to the future podlings
>>>>    2. I honestly don't know any other forum where I can meaningfully
>>>> discuss changes to release policy
>>>> I'll take advice on #2, of course.
>>> Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest legal-discuss.
>> I would really be surprised if VP Legal actually *owned* it. This
>> feels someplace between
>> INFRA, ComDev and Legal, but it still doesn't answer the question
>> who's a single throat
>> to choke.
> Consider yourself surprised then. V.P. Legal owns the release policy.

Is legal-discuss then the appropriate forum to actually build the consensus?
I surely hope V.P. Legal won't play a BDFL with our release policy, will he?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message