incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide
Date Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:17:15 GMT
This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences:

Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers
                    with information about what is wrong with the release.
Release managers should consider issues reported as blocking, unless told
otherwise
                    by those reporting the issue.

I'd rather not use the term "pass" and I'd prefer if it were understood by
podlings that the default should be to try to fix the release, unless its
explicitly called out.

John

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> I like it -- nice and simple. +1 to Justin's suggestion. Also,
> consider adding a sentence or two
> around the fact that podlings *may* get a pass on some of the more
> stringent requirements
> of a full blown TLP release, but a) it is not guaranteed b) it is up
> to mentors/IPMC to define
> what is appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nice and simple I like it. Perhaps add text or a link that podling
> releases need to be voted on this list here before being released?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message