incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Beam podling graduation readiness
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:41:20 GMT
(Not to leave the thread hanging -- all this has been done previously.)

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> Davor, congrants on the votes passing.
>
> It is customary to conclude the vote (especially a more official one like
> this)
> with a summary email with a subject:
>     [RESULT][VOTE]...
> giving the tally of everyone who voted. Please consider doing that.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Davor Bonaci <davor@apache.org> wrote:
> > Since the discussion seems to have concluded and the formal vote has
> passed
> > unanimously [1], I'll submit the draft resolution to the Board for their
> > consideration (per graduation guide [2]).
> >
> > Thanks everyone!
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71a1c63837a7d1506a10af9c70af1c
> 24db988451ac5b53fa2467b9b8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > [2]
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-
> level-board-proposal
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Davor Bonaci <davor@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Since it seems we have a consensus, I'm going to start a formal vote.
> >>
> >> Please keep the discussion going, and vote only after you feel ready.
> >> (Regardless of the outcome, we’d love to hear specific feedback on what
> can
> >> be improved going forward.)
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Sergio Fernández <wikier@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Out of personal technical interests, I've been following the podling
> quite
> >>> close.
> >>> They have made en enormous effort, both on the technical and community
> >>> sides.
> >>> I strongly believe the project is ready for graduation.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Davor Bonaci <davor@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi everyone,
> >>> > Apache Beam entered incubation in early February. Over the past 10
> >>> months,
> >>> > the podling has made great progress across various areas: refactoring
> >>> the
> >>> > project to remove any special treatment given to a runner or a
> vendor,
> >>> > building processes that encourage open development, evangelizing the
> >>> > project, and growing the community.
> >>> >
> >>> > Now, with the support of our mentors and overwhelming support from
> the
> >>> > wider Beam community [1], I’d like start a discussion on the
> progress we
> >>> > have made and a possible graduation recommendation as a new top-level
> >>> > project.
> >>> >
> >>> > To prepare for the discussion, we have published our self-assessment
> [2]
> >>> > against the Apache Maturity Model. We tried to include links and
> >>> evidence
> >>> > whenever applicable. I’ll summarize the commonly asked questions
> here,
> >>> but
> >>> > please see the self-assessment for additional information, various
> >>> details,
> >>> > graphs, evidence, etc.
> >>> >
> >>> > > Releases?
> >>> >
> >>> > Three -- all unanimously approved, all driven by different release
> >>> > managers, across different organizations. A detailed release guide
is
> >>> > available on the website.
> >>> >
> >>> > > Community growth?
> >>> >
> >>> > There has been a clear growth month-over-month. We have had 1500+
> pull
> >>> > requests on GitHub and 110+ individual code contributors. In terms
of
> >>> > mailing list activity, over the past 30 days, we have had 50+
> individual
> >>> > participants on dev@ and 35+ on user@.
> >>> >
> >>> > > Organizational influence?
> >>> >
> >>> > We have worked hard to remove any special treatment given to any
> >>> > organization. The bulk of the initial code donation came from Google,
> >>> but
> >>> > now both the project’s code and branding have a clean separation
> between
> >>> > the project and Google Cloud Dataflow (which has become just one of
> many
> >>> > runners that can be used within Beam).
> >>> >
> >>> > While it is true that Googlers continue to provide the majority of
> >>> commits,
> >>> > over the last three months no single organization has had more than
> >>> ~50% of
> >>> > unique monthly contributors. (Please see the graph in the
> >>> self-assessment.)
> >>> > Diverse influences are also particularly clear when you look across
> >>> modules
> >>> > within the project. Beam has about ~22 large modules in the
> codebase, at
> >>> > least 10 modules have been developed with little to no contribution
> from
> >>> > Googlers.
> >>> >
> >>> > Now, if we were to graduate, the Beam PPMC recommends the following
> >>> > information for the Board resolution:
> >>> >     * Project name: Apache Beam
> >>> >     * Project description and scope: a unified programming model for
> >>> both
> >>> > batch and streaming data processing, enabling efficient execution
> across
> >>> > diverse distributed execution engines and providing extensibility
> points
> >>> > for connecting to different technologies and user communities.
> >>> >     * PMC composition:
> >>> >          * Tyler Akidau <takidau@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Davor Bonaci <davor@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Ben Chambers <bchambers@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Luke Cwik <lcwik@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Dan Halperin <dhalperi@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Kenneth Knowles <kenn@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jbonofre@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Frances Perry <frances@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Amit Sela <amitsela@apache.org>
> >>> >          * Josh Wills <jwills@apache.org>
> >>> > (The ratification of the full text of the draft resolution is nearing
> >>> > completion.)
> >>> >
> >>> > While we have made great progress across the board (thanks to so
> many of
> >>> > you in this community), I’m sure there’s still plenty to do. We
> >>> continue to
> >>> > be focused on community growth, and processes that encourage open
> >>> > development. Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, we’d love
> to
> >>> get
> >>> > specific feedback on what can be improved going forward.
> >>> >
> >>> > Any thoughts, comments, questions or concerns? Thank you.
> >>> >
> >>> > Davor
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f133fb6bf2d1851d1bd5880c772e4b
> >>> > 050700154fa178fdb00a5b66bf@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>> > [2] http://beam.incubator.apache.org/contribute/maturity-model/
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sergio Fernández
> >>> Partner Technology Manager
> >>> Redlink GmbH
> >>> m: +43 6602747925
> >>> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >>> w: http://redlink.co
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message