incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:12:39 GMT
Perfect, already added to the wiki.
Thanks, Felix.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Hi Sergio
>
> Pleased to meet you and thanks for offering to become a mentor. That helps.
>
> Feel free to add yourself to the proposal
>
> Thanks
> Felix
>
> Am 04.11.2016 um 15:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wikier@apache.org<mailto:
> wikier@apache.org>>:
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> most of the ASF project have successfully manage to keep using GitHub for
> PRs, having the master git repository in ASF-controlled infrastructure. In
> the end it doesn't represent that big break on the common workflows. But
> definitely something the podling could try to address during incubation.
>
> I'd be happy to jump-in the proposal and help as mentor.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com
> <mailto:fmeschbe@adobe.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi John
>
> My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others
> have mentioned as well.
>
> Also Greg noted in the proposal:
>
> gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository
> system. The IPMC may have a differing opinion, but from an Infra
> perspective: the OpenWhisk podling can continue with their usage of a
> GitHub repository, but faces a clear obstacle: GitHub "as master [as
> allowed by the Foundation]" must be approved and working before the
> graduation, or they must migrate their primary to the Foundation's Git
> repository (at git-wip) before they graduate.
>
> I think this sounds like a good compromise to work on and the poddling
> intends to work actively with Infra to see that we can stay in GitHub. If
> that is not possible, we byte the bullet accordingly.
>
> In addition, also according to Greg:
>
> We require that anybody committing to a GitHub repository authenticates
> with BOTH: GitHub, and the ASF. No commits without that multiple
> authentication. (this is based on our current experiments with Whimsy and
> Traffic Server; same rules would apply to this podling)
>
> The original discussion took place after the initial submission, see [1]
>
> Does that help ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1c22a29b69e944ee725278aae05bd4
> 1dea80d10d0d204c26eb4cb24c@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org<h
> ttp://3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org>%3E
>
> Am 04.11.2016 um 15:20 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> <mailto:johndament@apache.org>>:
>
> I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo.  This is
> still
> unresolved, as I understood it.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com
> <mailto:fmeschbe@adobe.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
>
> - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected
>  that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional
>  code donated by IBM during incubation.
> - added a note on the API Gateway’s dependency on OpenSSL
> - added a note on Trademarks IBM is currently pursuing and
>  intends to transfer to ASF
> - fixed some typos
>
> With these changes and no discussions over the course of the recent
> weeks,
> I would propose we could could vote for OpenWhisk to become an
> incubating
> project over the course of next weeks.
>
> Of course we are still open to welcome interested people to become
> initial
> committers to OpenWhisk Servlerless Runtime and API Gateway !
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org<mailto:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org<mailto:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co<mailto:sergio.fernandez@redlink.co>
> w: http://redlink.co<http://redlink.co/>
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message