incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating
Date Sat, 29 Oct 2016 06:53:23 GMT
Yes. Good idea. Anyway the dependency should be optional (build in a dedicated profile or not).

Regards
JB

⁣​

On Oct 29, 2016, 08:22, at 08:22, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>For the future, we should maybe only build the Kinesis Connector in a
>profile. Then it would truly not be build. pushed to maven central,
>etc.
>For a normal build.
>
>On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 at 08:20 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Justin.
>>
>> Anyway I will double check the Kinesis client dependency definition.
>>
>> Thanks again
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> ⁣​
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2016, 08:18, at 08:18, Justin Mclean
><justin@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Changing my vote to +1 (binding).
>> >
>> >> Not sure I understand. If the dependency is optional and scope
>> >provided, I don't think it's an issue.
>> >
>> >In the legal JIRA and the discussion on the dev list there's no
>nothing
>> >about if the dependancy is considered optional or not that I could
>> >find.
>> >
>> >This of course may be obvious to people working on the project but
>not
>> >to people outside the project - so sorry about that. :-)
>> >
>> >> Kinesis IO will be used by a very small part of users imho (only
>the
>> >ones who needs pipelines connected with Kinesis).
>> >
>> >If that’s the case then IMO there no issue with the dependancy.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Justin
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 8-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message