incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stian Soiland-Reyes <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating
Date Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:34:20 GMT
On 26 September 2016 at 14:34, Mark Struberg <> wrote:
> We *never* push commits for in-progress votes to hte ASF repos when we use GIT!
> The reason is that we cannot get rid of those afterwards! Of course we can delete the
branch/tag/commit from the ASF repo, but we cannot delete them from all the hundreds downstream
repos which almost immediately pull those changes...
> You can think of pushing this to a private (but PMC owned!) github repo as kind of parallel
to the Maven 'staging'  process.

Of course it is up to each project what particular release/tag
practice they want to follow. Many projects do this classically even
with git, e.g. using branches or tags like 0.4-RC1 - see for instance:

Some communities like Apache Commons even keep around all RC tags;
then archived emails around failed RCs still have valid links - e.g.

I wouldn't personally see a problem with a RC branch showing up in
forked repositories - branches are there to be created and removed
again - if downstream want to keep them for archival purposes that's
their choice - just like they can keep the commit emails.

But if that's not your project's cup of tea, then I guess just a
commit IDs and hashes in the email should work, no matter where the
commit 'is' - in git the commit is hashed and it's not forgotten after
the vote is passed.

Perhaps "git tag --sign" so you get a PGP-signed tag commit would be a
good idea?

Without the commit ID or hashes in the email - then particularly for
mutable release candidates tags hosted in third-party repositories, we
don't have a record over exactly what was voted on and the commiter
could easily by mistake push the 'wrong' RC commits or dists without
anyone being able to notice or check later. In fact, this very vote
shows two different commit IDs which this time luckily had the same

Many projects posts RCs on -
which is SVN-based - here the revision number and log is sufficient -
we assume the ASF-hosted SVN repository to be 'trusted'. A closed
Nexus repository is similarly tracked and immutable.

Stian Soiland-Reyes

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message