incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2016 21:01:43 GMT
John, is there any additional information we can provide for your review?

Frank

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Orhan Kislal <okislal@pivotal.io> wrote:

> John,
>
> I know of this commit and I cannot see any distinction between the
> src/utils folder and many other excluded folders. Here is the phrase from
> the LICENSE file:
>
> The rest of the source code, unless explicitly marked with an Apache
> License
> header, should be assumed to be coming from previous life of MADlib as a
> BSD licensed project and is available under the following license:
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Frank pointed me to this commit - which changes a bunch of things to
> Apache
> > License:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 PM Orhan Kislal <okislal@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it
> > indicates
> > > that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to
> the
> > > commit tag that you mentioned?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Orhan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Frank,
> > > >
> > > > Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in
> the
> > > > explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> > > > headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> > > > license they're falling under?
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan <
> fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > John,
> > > > >
> > > > > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we
> brought
> > > the
> > > > > files into ASF:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > > > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > > > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > > > > and they have not been changed since that time.
> > > > >
> > > > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> > > > >
> > > > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > > > > src/utils
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <
> > > fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> > > > release
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how
to
> > > proceed
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was
under a
> > > > 2-clause
> > > > > > BSD
> > > > > > > license.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as
per:
> > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > > > >
> > > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this
3rd
> > > release
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > did the same.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for
> > src/utils.
> > > > > Why
> > > > > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> > > > NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Frank
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer <
> rahulriyer@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
> madlib/KEYS>
> > > and
> > > > > > > didn't
> > > > > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature)
to
> > > > > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > > > > and should be available now after you update your
local
> cache.
> > Is
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you
look at it
> and
> > > tell
> > > > > me
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016
EDT using RSA
> > key
> > > ID
> > > > > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public
key
> > > > > > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your
key uploaded
> > to a
> > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > > server?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan
<
> > > > > > fmcquillan@pivotal.io
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community
has voted on and
> > > > > approved
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.
> > org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > > > > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-
> > KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > > > > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib
(incubating).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > > > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection,
> > prediction
> > > > > > metrics,
> > > > > > > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > > > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class
weights in SVM,
> > > > > > overlapping
> > > > > > > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > > > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > > > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > > > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > > > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For more information including release notes,
please see:
> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/
> > > > MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look
inside of
> > pom.xml
> > > to
> > > > > see
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there
for RAT.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > > > > > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Source Files:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > > > > > > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib
> > .
> > > > > > > > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to
sign the release:
> > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept
9 at 6 pm
> > Pacific
> > > > > time.
> > > > > > > ***
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message