incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Apple <>
Subject How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:39:50 GMT
Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not
to clutter the VOTE thread.

> - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] (not sure
what this is)

This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same
in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing

How should we annotate those to clarify our beliefs to voters and reviewers?

Another example of a confusing thing that might stay the same is the
license and copyright on

> 9 ./be/src/thirdparty/squeasel/squeasel.?

This might not have been part of the SGA; I'll have to check. Assuming
for the purposes of this question that it was not part of the software
grant, how can we annotate that to clarify?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message