incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:27:07 GMT
I would have assumed that if Netbeans stakeholders had any issues
or question, or requests for clarification, they would have
pinged either their champion or one of their proposed mentors.

As it is, it is only on this thread, and not on any Incubator/vote
thread that I can see that this even came up, and even then
it could easily have been overlooked.

To be clear: "Netbeans stakeholders" had serious and misleading
information about what Apache provided and it was only brought
out via some backchannel discussion with someone not involved
in the Netbeans proposal (from the Apache side) at all... AND
that this information was ONLY brought out during a thread on
board@ about TAC.

Hopefully this clarifies my comments.

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <> wrote:
>>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:
>>> Bingo! This is word-for-word what I was explaining at f2f with NetBeans
>>> stakeholders yesterday. There assumption was that ASF is a free version
>>> of what Sun and Oracle were providing in terms of infrastructure to their
>>> project. All the bells-n-whistles. Everything.
>> This is the first I heard of this... Anyone from the podling mentor
>> list there?
>> Seems a weird out-of-band conversation to have with "stakeholders"
> Huh? I really don't get either of your comments.
> Thanks,
> Roman.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message