incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:37:51 GMT
+1 (binding) also.

With regards,

On 07/09/2016 10:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote:
>> I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it could
give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it only works with ATS. This
is true now, but won't be in the future.
> I'm not sure a bit of internal organisation will make much difference
> once you start listing TC+TS and TC+Other as equally valid options.
> But I don't want to make an issue of it.
>> Only one or two people actively work on both projects, the development communities
are mostly separate.
> OK, thanks.
>> I'm not familiar with the HTTPD and APR history, is there a lesson we should learn
from that?
> The main issue we've found is that with a close relationship and with
> a large overlap between the dev teams, we've often found a development
> in HTTPD driving one in APR, even to the point of "we need a new APR
> release that'll support [new HTTPD feature]".  At the same time, the
> original reason for the separation - that APR has applications outside
> httpd (Apache SVN being one such) - works well.
> On reflection, you probably have a cleaner separation than that anyway.
> +1 (binding) to your vote.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message