incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal
Date Tue, 24 May 2016 00:45:08 GMT
+1 to that, Julian. You were absolutely right, I apologize I did not make
it clear.

Really appreciate another set of eyes reviewing it.

- Henry

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:

> For the record, at the time that I reviewed the github repo, there was
> code that was not merely *inspired* by Mondrian code, but *derived*
> from Mondrian code. But that code has since been removed, so the issue
> is resolved. With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming
> IP and ongoing diligence by the PPMC we'll be fine.
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I thought the concern had been addressed?
> >
> > For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but
> do
> > not have direct derivatives of the code.
> > According to Jacky, the old code is no longer used.
> >
> > As for Julien concern about Parquet, the design seemed to be inspired by
> > Parquet and ORC.
> > And if needed, we could add reference to Parquet in the code
> documentation.
> > Since Parquet is ASF project, I believe we are in good shape in
> CarbonData
> > goes to ASF.
> >
> > If any other action item is needed please do suggest so we could make
> > correction as part of incubation process.
> >
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey <
> marvin@rectangular.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Luke,
> >> >>
> >> >> I fully agree with you. The committers are already involved to
> clean-up
> >> the
> >> >> repo (PRs have been created).
> >> >>
> >> >> IMHO, this step is decoupled from the proposal vote itself: the only
> >> >> requirement is to do it for the code donation, after the proposal
> vote.
> >> >
> >> > What will the process for this be?  On this thread we have two outside
> >> > authors recognizing their own work, but that's obviously not a
> >> > realistic mechanism for identifying all potentially problematic IP.
> >>
> >> Given that this is a donation from a corporate entity a request for BD
> >> (or similar)
> >> scan results (if they are available) may help. That's how every
> >> corporate-sponsored
> >> donation (at least dozens I've been involved in) does risk mitigation
> >> anyway.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roman.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message