incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal
Date Fri, 20 May 2016 15:47:54 GMT
The current list of initial committers was that provided me by the
PredictionIO folks so I have every reason to believe they all have a stake
at entering incubation.

It's totally fine with me if we stick to that list. I am just trying to
facilitate the fairest process possible.

On Friday, May 20, 2016, Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:

> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I definitely have concerns about too many folks becoming initial
> committers
> > and bringing their own corporate agendas to this project.
> >
> > I suggest that first we vote PIO into incubator then bring in those less
> > experienced with the project. We have a good start with people who have
> > worked on the project from several orgs. Let us get organized first and
> > then bring in new people.
> I think this is a reasonable concern. Andrew, any chance you can look over
> the names of initial committers and let us know who has had a stake in the
> project before entering the incubation vs. those who are trying to join in
> as
> part of the ASF Incubation.
> I'm not saying we need to pass judgement one way or the other yet, but it
> will be a very useful data point to know before voting.
> Thanks,
> Roman.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <javascript:;>

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message