incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)
Date Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:47:52 GMT
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Sam Ruby <> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler
> <> wrote:
> > Good point. I should add to my comments that even a CTR project uses RTC
> for non-committers. And that a release vote means that at least three
> people have reviewed the code from (at least) an IP standpoint, if not from
> a code quality standpoint.
> >
> > In other words, +1
> >
> > However, RTC projects do not use a mix and that's the point of
> contention here, some people feel it is suboptimal (I'm one, but others
> disagree). The discussion is not whether CTR also uses RTC at points, I
> believe that is a given.
> Let me be pedantic for a moment.  While RTC projects that use
> Subversion may disallow work in branches, even by committers; such a
> restriction isn't even possible in Git -- even for non committers.

Not only isn't something you can forbid, it isn't even something that I
could understand without reading your sentence three times.

Git is all about branching. Forbidding branches is a non sequitur.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message