On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> If there is a disagreement, it seems to be part semantics, part version
> control technologies (i.e. SVN optimized workflow vs Git optimized
> workflow) and part an actual difference in how to handle certain
> situations. It seems to me that the actual disagreement is pretty small. ;-)
>
No, it isn't small. I believe RTC as a standard policy is actively harmful.
Proponents use excuses for it, but using RTC for trunk/master is (IMO)
always a mechanism for control, exclusion, and a lack of trust of your
peers/community.
Cheers,
-g
|