incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <Ross.Gard...@microsoft.com>
Subject RE: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)
Date Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:23:15 GMT
Good point. I should add to my comments that even a CTR project uses RTC for non-committers.
And that a release vote means that at least three people have reviewed the code from (at least)
an IP standpoint, if not from a code quality standpoint.

In other words, +1

However, RTC projects do not use a mix and that's the point of contention here, some people
feel it is suboptimal (I'm one, but others disagree). The discussion is not whether CTR also
uses RTC at points, I believe that is a given.

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: sa3ruby@gmail.com [mailto:sa3ruby@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 7:43 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

+1 here too.

Most projects here fall somewhere in a spectrum between "do whatever you want in a branch"
and "don't release without having others approve your work".  Different projects put the point
where CTR crosses over to RTC at different points.

*shrug*

- Sam Ruby

P.S.  Personally a fan of CTR, but I'm starting to appreciate our infrastructure team's puppet
workflow where everything (even one line
changes) are done in a branch and everybody asks other person to merge the changes.

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fcwiki.apache.org%2fconfluence%2fdisplay%2fINFRA%2fGit%2bworkflow%2bfor%2binfrastructure-puppet%2brepo&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c44adea1c26a1499d757f08d2f1c13a31%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=485qCjFlNzNCg1JvNgDxSpSe79EwynxdP9RcmoEOsxw%3d

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> ++1
>> On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>> ...httpd for example) uses RTC, CTR and Lazy Consensus 
>>> simultaneously and works like a dream....
>>
>> Indeed - those are different tools that each have their own purpose.
>> They just need to be applied in the right places and at the right 
>> time.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Mime
View raw message