incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)
Date Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:57:48 GMT


The question is whether the claim that the code is actually under ASL is correct. If the contributors
didn't understand that the ASL was to be applied or have some grotesque misunderstanding about
what copyright means or what granting an irrevocable license means, it is good to flush it

Most people just won't care especially in a moribund project. 

Also, the email confirmation is just for small bits.  And iCla would be preferable for big

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 28, 2015, at 15:13, Alex Harui <> wrote:

>> A simple email confirmation should be fine.
> So, no ICLA required from these contributors?  And if we don't hear back
> from a contributor, we can't take his code?  And does the code that does
> get permission still have to go through IP Clearance or do we trust it
> because it is already AL?

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message