From general-return-50214-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jul 15 10:51:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E64A3180E1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97381 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2015 10:51:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97199 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2015 10:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97188 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2015 10:51:57 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7A4271A6FED for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.001 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0IozenlB8iEA for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-f51.google.com (mail-vn0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D29FD20F17 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vnbf7 with SMTP id f7so4061318vnb.1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:51:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=3Q97uG2w9MvV+3anInniOH5Xk4nKAQp8KdSo9vwWMNc=; b=V4lZi0lwnXofgNE8W0F48Uj8hLp75aTH++4uu57bvBBZJ1a3wi+VnVGF585dXYNm0C 6nZtzEnNSnL9i4w8G9u9M15OZHx1cMnqPvSHSM5bq8OoNhCVYcJnlOU3c3/1FUO/89pb zlHy+xwEmv4ysB4ZLyukZ5aQqXiE9pfXY+rHFiNoQDQZXYClQ97W8qOxXpo7q2+FsvMM SnWHFBGp4uAx7v7C46W/mrGlJTJfWGlHZqnxPT5/uIsnSult64pYgsIlRCNwFP+DKcl3 J3sGZ52Tl8H8aERNzJ2Rqrr8MzSP3qwtN0ypvmW6BKGVrtkLzWhYkSewNIx079yeURZl KG3w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGIOZLlIZtjF0yrRWbXcuwswORbc6TE7446dKsb6t0QXYEDy5vS8UGKY9cKmJB0lYqf356 X-Received: by 10.52.135.202 with SMTP id pu10mr3697096vdb.40.1436957509398; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:51:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.131.14 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:51:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ian Maxon Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:51:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Podling request: Gerrit To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > That is the question, indeed. And, please, keep in mind that the > answer must satisfy not a humble developer with "no red tape" in mind, > but a lawyer. I guess there's some legal issue I'm ignorant of here then. How would one submit a patch, without cloning from the official mirror, and hence becoming just as aware of ASF involvement as they would otherwise? > Well, for starters: There's a certain degree of integration between > Github and the ASF infrastructure. For example, I am reading about > pull requests on ASF mailing lists. Likewise, I follow the discussion > on the same mailing lists. > > Or, in other words: By reading those mailing lists, I am fully informed. If that's an issue it's an easy one to resolve (as stated before). Both Gerrit and Jenkins can output that type of mail without trouble. - Ian On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > >> Then what are they submitting a patch for review to, exactly? > > That is the question, indeed. And, please, keep in mind that the > answer must satisfy not a humble developer with "no red tape" in mind, > but a lawyer. > > >>> Second, Gerrit is where everything is really happening: >>> contributions, code review, testing (from a Jenkins instance at UCI). >> >> What, per se, is unique about that? I could point at any number of >> Apache projects where the activity is happening mostly in Github pull >> requests, and the testing in Travis CI. These are all external >> services that the community decided worked best for them. We have >> external services that we like too, just different ones. > > Well, for starters: There's a certain degree of integration between > Github and the ASF infrastructure. For example, I am reading about > pull requests on ASF mailing lists. Likewise, I follow the discussion > on the same mailing lists. > > Or, in other words: By reading those mailing lists, I am fully informed. > > Jochen > > > -- > Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, > and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org