From general-return-50258-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jul 16 17:34:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE9AF189CA for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11106 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2015 17:34:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10915 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2015 17:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10890 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2015 17:34:08 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:34:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6720218286D for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LIVE=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQEwJzuiChC9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0186E43DDB for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([85.180.45.125]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIyCj-1ZHhup2jI9-002YDH for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <55A7EB40.1080402@gmx.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:34:56 +0200 From: Jochen Theodorou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating References: <4C228491-AED5-45BF-9359-991A7E96D750@classsoftware.com> <55A76F95.2040208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:M9Zfn1//JO3KRR0p3Vr/VLk4GCeQmpg/A9+PeVOZG4hdQ18a32S uoSa8K6mQ9cfQOf052nyHE/Ka2kWAbdboD8qMEKdsnWf0j66PKneCCS2YlFCjZenkoqMsyZ LTJcFhrsIFKfHEv8bbXV8PgyQeY/+plkd8pKAr87Z89kSuZdVIgVFcfb/qA+qS3eymzEQN2 yYtUIWeoOonDTXYdZEz5w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:E7iqN+4MhEY=:T0QCO6wU3arG7LqQcJMRoK Kvh5fO7nzGnQrJE2HBHKT3wy+ykf1LlrI8J7TO+7gR74wRj/pXYuJfUd8bbQgR11kFBe/S7hz UGShiInuyM8SwmfS3ds2Y3RdAenH4YBeD9xArMnSSMFsb8TTkYPwsOmnZ+zjEKFtUj2d6VtPW 0L5Wda9uC/DXhxsOYOOBQxD1D9LBMgnepD7GQ0tqnYW/qmZpc5PNkzk3gOD5CFscA/62iufX6 nERYis0LZIlGmpYzXKOvWFneGd4zhkgqwShe3pSYCCjjm6gaYWeOjfslj9g8uikMoZpxVsDZe 1Si+TbtSxv7IpgjPjgraX1kkPFWaKLQeVJkuv+/Nslb5r7TbVxzA/x2kyYo53EyFmcSm0XUsb qFMEwWILGTvHQISNGP9/Pr9zeMklCoQ3zBd+jPz8WNG5MZfVwifqhDe8f4NZj9UusE9yC8GMg HSwrDMoNYTzQz7CH6LBzj2cwOQ/9UBkuC9ORzoMKAJEHT/t7PDXKK7vTDLxt36Y0Q4ucdtp9X KA9t7tx7DG30AtR4iTt8BrHsj5PEN3/QDRh84kNs0IR6tka5M3O1yn4mpDvhvjgwOueEAH6ah hM7WIE70QcEUPSgM8D7pBvdmcE+tCq4hXduvB2wZLS1Hs1c4fORUndpIdzdmwjv5wn3x22DG+ F0T45gLPIJLmoa7IIjwgMmYLB6bioExrbYHH4aGbnL1xwSKlrD2CcU3zgRwaq9LC9LSI= Am 16.07.2015 18:49, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>>> This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1" >>>> binding votes. >>> If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the binary releases. >> >> True. I -1 the binary release. Interesting case : should we release if >> we have as many -1 than +1 ? > > Personally, I'm disappointed in the podling for not taking > care of feedback that seems really easy to take care of. but not in time, because the apache process is too slow. What so you prefer? A unfixed zero-day vulnerability reported against an apache project, or a podling release which is not 100% according to strict apache views. We are not a TLP yet after all. And this release is a special case. That security fix is the only reason why we did want release ASAP. We own it to the community to be able to react to such things fast. And I really would not like to explain to our users that we could not do a release, because of a minor issue. If the apache process would not be so slow, we would of course have made it different. But waiting another 6 days, while some will be in holidays already, would have been a problem. bye blackdrag -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org