incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator
Date Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:10:05 GMT
@Branko: are referring to TEZ in your last posting, or Ignite?

If you are talking about ignite, have a look at:
http://markmail.org/search/incubator.ignite+list:org.apache.ignite.dev and
http://markmail.org/search/incubator.ignite+list:org.apache.ignite.user and
check out the 'Who sent it' overviews of each and compare that to the list
of names (and affiliations). in
http://ignite.incubator.apache.org/community/resources.html

Then you have the basis for assessing how well the podling has been doing
the community building aspect and embedding diversity and independence
during the incubation phase up to now.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:

> On 21.07.2015 21:04, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > Actually, given that this project was a spin-out of an internal project,
> > this is a stunningly low number to have achieved so quickly (assuming
> that
> > the 37% are actually active, that is).
>
> Indeed. And yes, they're active; that's easily established by reading
> the dev@ list, commit log and Jira log.
>
> I was quite surprised by how quickly the project got contributors from
> "outside", and anyone who takes the trouble to actually look at how the
> community operates will find that it is very helpful and receptive. I
> wouldn't be surprised if there are quite a few TPLs and even recently
> graduated podlings that could take the Ignite community as an example
> rather than the other way around.
>
> I suggest that everyone who doubts that this is an "open and diverse
> community" should go and read the mailing list archives for the last few
> months or so instead of making uninformed statements based on some
> incidental numbers. If, on the other hand, you prefer running the IPMC
> using statistics instead of facts, you could at least have made the
> effort to look at the trends instead of a point-in-time snapshot.
>
> -- Brane
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message