incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Reich <stefan.reich.maker.of....@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Licensing Issue
Date Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:02:55 GMT
I will personally abolish copyright. Join the future.

unlicense.org
Am 27.06.2015 19:09 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com>:

> Stefan,
>
> It is hard to understand what you meant since we don't have a common frame
> of reference.
>
> It sounds like you want to share with others.  That is great.
>
> But it also sounds like you want to disregard how the world works with
> respect to copyrights.  That won't work.  As I have just proved in this
> same discussion, it is very common that no matter what you know, there is
> more that you don't know.  Copyrights are complicated and won't go away.
>
> In your case, it sounds like you need to find ways to share that are as
> easy as possible.  That is what Apache licenses are for.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Reich <
> stefan.reich.maker.of.eye@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do you think I meant?
> > Am 26.06.2015 08:51 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Stefan,
> > >
> > > In order to "open source" something, you have to define what you mean
> by
> > > "open source".  If you mean that anybody can do anything at all with
> the
> > > code including claim it as their own, then you mean to put it into the
> > > public
> > > domain <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain>.
> > >
> > > If you mean anything else at all, then you have to specify what you
> mean.
> > > Even if all you want to say is that people have to admit that you wrote
> > the
> > > code, you have to specify that.
> > >
> > > The way that you specify what you want is to pick or write a license.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Reich <
> > > stefan.reich.maker.of.eye@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please - can we all stop using "licenses" and just open source
> > > everything?
> > > > Progress is waiting for us.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, I am now adding all (!) programming languages to the realm of
> AI.
> > > > (Meaning they can then be programmed automatically.)
> tinybrain.blog.de
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Stefan
> > > > Am 21.06.2015 00:51 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> > > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Folks,
> > > > > I am looking for some advice here.
> > > > > We are currently in conversation about potentially transitioning
> the
> > > > Joshua
> > > > > project [0] to the foundation. Our current conversation is ongoing
> at
> > > > [1].
> > > > > From one of the key developers of Joshua, the following question
> has
> > > > arose;
> > > > > There is an issue with an LGPL'd library for handling language
> models
> > > > > (KenLM
> > > > > <https://github.com/kpu/kenlm>). There is an alternative
> > (BerkeleyLM),
> > > > but
> > > > > it is not actively maintained any more and is not quite as good as
> > > KenLM
> > > > in
> > > > > a few key respects. A quick glance at the incubator page suggests
> > that
> > > > this
> > > > > dependency would keep the project from becoming a full-fledged one.
> > Can
> > > > you
> > > > > comment on this?
> > > > > Thanks for any input folks
> > > > > Lewis
> > > > >
> > > > > [0] http://joshua-decoder.org/
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/joshua-decoder/joshua/issues/204
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Lewis*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message