incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <>
Subject Re: Soliciting feedback for a detailed pTLP policy document
Date Tue, 03 Mar 2015 05:53:44 GMT
Thanks Roman,

I think that it is unnecessary to mention "sub-projects" in this document.
If an external codebase and community are going into an existing TLP, it is
often possible to do so via an IP Clearance process, depending on size of
external community.

// Niclas

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:

> Hi!
> since a few board members requested a detailed document
> outlining the exact policy of a pTLP project, I've created this:
> which is modeled after the Incubator policy document. My rationale
> is this: if the level of details of the Incubator policy is considered
> good enough for poddlings, holding pTLP project to higher level
> of standard would be unfair.
> At this point, I would like to open this document for soliciting as
> wide a feedback as possible. I would like to especially request
> attention of the ASF board members who asked for this type of
> a document to be available.
> Please feel free to either comment on this email thread or edit
> the document directly (do send me your Confluence IDs so I can
> give you karma, though).
> I would like to see if we can build consensus around this policy
> in time for the March board meeting so that Zest can try one more
> time to join ASF as a pTLP project.
> Thanks,
> Roman.

Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer - New Energy for Java

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message