incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <>
Subject Re: When is an ICLA needed?
Date Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:40:06 GMT
On 20.01.2015 17:16, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> I agree with Bertrand. Note whoever commits the patch is doing so under their ICLA.

Really? That can't be right: one can't become the author of a change
(and therefore can't license it to the ASF) merely by having committed
it. That's why we require an audit trail to the original author, right?

>  In other words if someone feels it does not contain significant IP then they can commit.
> Paperwork is a barrier to entry which is simply not necessary for trivial contributions.

That's a different matter, and I agree.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message