From general-return-46201-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Oct 1 05:20:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1754A179FD for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 05:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19739 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2014 05:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19543 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2014 05:20:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19531 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2014 05:20:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:20:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.42] (HELO mail-pa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.220.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:19:41 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bj1so130435pad.1 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:19:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QJDasTJSFrVLymrO2K4biaXQMnVKh9fpuup6w6hjLDM=; b=eFRTvAe2OLUbExSecqyMOs2GPwTBpRgYitObs/t3UPR3hItAoBvJ0VmZKmoN7FQlQ7 CbFBzZdLhu7ECliChAr+NX+1vBCA3iOQHzG/8gmbcnZzsxYX7OeOIrKrW3/MWeVICP2H zkpgl1lzNUao8BR9VL7BD9+R8c8ua/1QPTUal9AsJZ7afSq/6NKnrBV+uOqlIlL5n9ZM deXn7vTujxeWqytPqaiWqBfvCuwgkRU0Q4icPe4hQBsYeoB3OWZEAmyuXE4rkTyeVXL0 Uglhb6flHEB8BRarZDJkPkqsDvFSxvBOAVPLq3Q4jHdMtt4b24l6ZugRiMmFmvJyMV9M F0vA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmoPNZztCfR4mjIqGvrE9vCL46k0jUFbPOKyxP2yo7XP9kErPTK+VDt0P5h7lmK0THdVGkS X-Received: by 10.68.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr20403473pbb.160.1412140778917; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (ppp121-44-240-220.lns20.syd7.internode.on.net. [121.44.240.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm16694213pdc.68.2014.09.30.22.19.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Brett Porter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos From: Brett Porter In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:19:33 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As an additional reference, here's a previous thread on the topic: = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201303.mbox/%3C= CAPFNckiJy6TM5tYCfN7mScH6h0v_eaR7ws5QMfTEGaoo+DoktQ@mail.gmail.com%3E Cheers, Brett On 26 Sep 2014, at 1:59 pm, Alex Harui wrote: > In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that = voting > for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single = person > can block the adding of a candidate. >=20 > Do any projects use some form of majority voting for new committers? = What > are the reasons for allowing vetoes? >=20 > Thanks, > -Alex >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org