From general-return-46409-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Oct 21 04:46:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60811175BF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5490 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 04:46:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5283 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 04:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5272 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2014 04:46:01 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:46:01 +0000 Received: from zulu.local (cpe-90-157-246-145.dynamic.amis.net [90.157.246.145]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 9C3B61A0379 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5445E4FF.40507@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:45:51 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Convenience Binary Policy References: <27DE8F40-CE4A-4553-AD02-39FA4CF98B28@classsoftware.com> In-Reply-To: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 21.10.2014 06:34, Alex Harui wrote: > What is the piece I’m missing that says we have to vote to update the > binary package? Apparently the Flex community believes that convenience binaries need votes. They don't, but aside from that, if you guys are already voting on binary packages, it makes perfect sense to vote for your fixed version, if only to keep people happy. -- Brane P.S.: Why anyone would think voting on binaries makes any kind of sense around here is, of course, a different question. I can't even begin to count the number of times it's been pointed out that binaries are not Apache releases. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org