From general-return-46347-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Oct 13 19:44:45 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15825174D4 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96373 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2014 19:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96170 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2014 19:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21169 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2014 16:15:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:face:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4X+tK1AI9fqh8KsTqX7v1fS+JcB2ootVV/w0P9ZiNzY=; b=bGb0JJknHIxWt49Mwr9Uf+ZgBNFOWk7mNW/SYG5baChpSqsXn/TJlft3p4hr3Zb4a4 yIPvvwYWDYqUx4bVU/4YMxV0bu/w5OuoeEHcv3HtAAR3qxgv5Rtque6w/B9TQSXvGVla jLuW2Onc6vFpyTIX7F0O8BEUA/yua0bnvmbCdKK4gh7/diKnZAg/7wZZFx07NZmOF/BJ w0Jg0ZY+gs/M6+ldu4lzSm+qRozmnP/MSbGprYX3ufcehPAMngFNWCBkSH8+LuR4l+yG k3xlvLA8UTkKSZSKrEYjK+fqbxCy+gOwkJ18X7M0Nqwjj+5l2kbXUcZ1QS7dqXl+dgPV ByjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmq6+FXpfR6dOoIwO3XJindfcrKDmjXlpY3G6ZC/nvDcNBn/bzNkRAbrqq8ngjqUjJOV2Yv X-Received: by 10.194.143.69 with SMTP id sc5mr22195417wjb.49.1413216917351; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=C4=8Cibej?= Message-ID: <543BFA96.7020706@e-reka.si> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:15:18 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release References: <3EBF9D26-0A96-4707-9C5F-9AEAE2FACC73@classsoftware.com> <16C4881E-A3F9-4A6A-A4F4-B1677DD85873@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <16C4881E-A3F9-4A6A-A4F4-B1677DD85873@gmail.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote: > For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently include a binary tar ball, only a source tar ball and maven jars. > > Are these jars subjected to due diligence during the release vote? It seems to me that each of those jars is a de facto binary release. If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. Binary JARs are definitely a binary release. I haven't a clue what Javadocs are, but since they're derived from the sources, I'd prefer to put them in the "binary" category for simplicity. But that's beside the point. "Convenience binaries" are anything that was created from the properly voted-on and released source that did not go through the same formal release proces as the source release. If the PMC did not vote on the binary JARs, they are not an Apache Release and therefore none of our guarantees (or liabilities) can apply to them. -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org