From general-return-46418-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Oct 21 13:56:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53D55176AF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8794 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 13:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8610 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 13:56:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8598 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2014 13:56:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harbs.lists@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.181] (HELO mail-wi0-f181.google.com) (209.85.212.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:56:44 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so1905244wib.8 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:55:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MbDZFGrr7WexFhVA3bqxx2qtEBheplR3usXtHOUHJ3Q=; b=AsCDHP8ZkWJQ6Q2kj6vj0zq2UcdN7Bay3tJPe12B2ca8GtXo2Fz0y4bMl2WVUJv35c inZXaaHx0iNzXHx5y8XOXdcTDLGXj1+recjYm0Bm2GtdPes8KQdSnhaIL9YLztzqqCVE xnHjyEWlTt9sLsqkuX0AjH4hV08or6/ggpp/nkreyitSWiv/5Md4/h5u0Ocb+y2/NzyO j6CmX3reAKI9BAb/4xwo6lBSza6gCg/UtkfKE5s9NM+qI2fYNKZ4sT/6JgrqxZoYaJ63 +awA6aQyg/kbJrdSab5FxF1t78ZvgfExNyULOnvFpnrrDDN3d0VuBg5QR9qJDwZ9X6eQ h8HA== X-Received: by 10.194.100.98 with SMTP id ex2mr41420067wjb.48.1413899736029; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] ([5.102.217.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bc5sm15479979wjb.14.2014.10.21.06.55.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Convenience Binary Policy From: Harbs In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:55:33 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0CB3B5DE-093C-44F7-9B7B-4E53FD194724@gmail.com> References: <27DE8F40-CE4A-4553-AD02-39FA4CF98B28@classsoftware.com> <5445E4FF.40507@apache.org> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The one thing I see missing from the proposed text is dependencies and = installers. Particularly this section: ### Compiled packages ### {#compiled-packages} The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All = releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to the software being released. As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to = build a compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be = distributed alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package MUST have the same version number as the source release and MUST only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release. --- How do binary dependencies fit in? On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 10/21/14, 5:57 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> The problem is that we lack a concise policy document. That's where = the >> "ASF >> release policy codification proposal" as worked through on = legal-discuss >> a few >> months ago is supposed to help. >>=20 >> http://s.apache.org/aGm >> https://github.com/rectang/asfrelease >=20 > Hi Marvin, IMO, this version of the document also doesn=E2=80=99t = prohibit me from > updating the binary package without a vote. It seems like some = portions > of this document is supposed to apply to binary packages like the > LICENSE/NOTICE sections so I think that=E2=80=99s why there is still = ongoing > debate on the Flex mailing list about whether I can in fact modify the > FlexJS binary package. >=20 > At this point, unless someone not on the Flex PMC says that we can=E2=80= =99t make > the modifications, I am planning to add a new entry to the Flex = Installer > that points to bits that are hosted on my personal server called = =E2=80=9CApache > FlexJS 0.0.2 (with Jburg)=E2=80=9D and expose it to the general = public. All of > the compiled bits are the same, but I have added the jburg.jar to the > package to workaround the problem. The original binary package will > remain on dist/mirrors. >=20 > Thanks, > -Alex >=20 > = =03B=EF=BF=BDKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK= KKKKKKKCB=EF=BF=BD=1B=EF=BF=BD=1D[=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDX=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=DC= =9AX=EF=BF=BDK=08=19K[XZ[=0E=EF=BF=BD=19=EF=BF=BD[=EF=BF=BD\=EF=BF=BD[=0B= ][=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDX=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=DC=9AX=EF=BF=BDP=1A[=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF= =BDX=EF=BF=BD]=1B=DC=8B=EF=BF=BD\=18X=EF=BF=BD=19K=EF=BF=BD=DC=99=EF=BF=BD= B=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=DC=88=18Y=19=1A]=1A[=DB=98[=08=18=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD[X[= =EF=BF=BD=1C=EF=BF=BD=08=19K[XZ[=0E=EF=BF=BD=19=EF=BF=BD[=EF=BF=BD\=EF=BF=BD= [=0BZ=19[=1C=10=1A[=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDX=EF=BF=BD]=1B=DC=8B=EF=BF=BD\=18X=EF= =BF=BD=19K=EF=BF=BD=DC=99=EF=BF=BDB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org