This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is:
+1 Ted
+1 Lars
+1 Justin
+1 or -1: Grant
-0 Jan
I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern
and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to
see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for
additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify
his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does
that sound?
thanks,
Jacques
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > If it contains sources, it's not a binary release.
> >
> > Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples.
>
>
> Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses
> requires that snippets of source for different operators and system
> packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about
> this source, much of which is machine generated from templates.
>
> From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they
> can download it and run Drill with no further build steps.
>
|