incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:27:00 GMT
Ted,

Do you mean more than here:

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
[2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the new process documented somewhere?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > approves
> > > that release:
> > >
> > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > directories" [1]
> > >
> > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> piece
> > > of information:
> > >
> > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> >
> > Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
> >
> > Note that the DEV tree at
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
> >
> > is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
> >
> > The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
> >
> > Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> > transfer the files from dev to release area.
> > This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> > SVN revision number)
> >
> > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> approval
> > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > >>
> > >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > >>
> > >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi John,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > concerns:
> > >> >
> > >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > >> >
> > >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> copyright
> > and
> > >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > >> >
> > >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > >> >
> > >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > tests.
> > >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
of
> > >> their
> > >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> code.
> > >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> > for
> > >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > >> > purposes.
> > >> >
> > >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > >> > vs 0.5.0)
> > >> >
> > >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> > the
> > >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> > >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > candidates so
> > >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > candidate
> > >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > Apache
> > >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > For
> > >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > >> > strategy thus far:
> > >> >
> > >> > our m1 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > (approved)
> > >> -->
> > >> > and distributed as
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > >> >
> > >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> > -->
> > >> > distributed as
> > >> >
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > >> >
> > >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > process.
> > >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > external
> > >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > >> >
> > >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > >> release.
> > >> >
> > >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> > >> > Jacques
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > >> (0.5.0.rc2
> > >> > vs
> > >> > > 0.5.0)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > John
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacques@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > >> release
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> have
> > >> > passed
> > >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
with
> > over
> > >> > 100
> > >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback
in
> our
> > >> > > previous
> > >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing
our
> > license
> > >> and
> > >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > that
> > >> > are
> > >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote passed with:
> > >> > > > +5 binding
> > >> > > > +6 non-binding
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Jacques
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message