incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria
Date Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:47:48 GMT
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
> >> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings?
> >
> > I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic
> > currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were
> > sorted out.
> >
> > With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to
> > check back with the Attic people if they can handle this.
> >
> > Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho
> > its the reason why its there.
>
> Quick question: who's in charge of saying 'yay' or 'nay' to Incubator
> projects coming to the Attic?
>
> > Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around
> > here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people
> feel.
> > I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention.
>
> Will do shortly. Btw, I presume you're talking about the patch
> to the Incubator web pages documenting the policy, right?
>
> At least that's what I'm going to patch and send for a VOTE
>
>
>
What happpened to you agreeing to try it with a few of the old podlings
first?

   ...ant

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message