incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kasper Sørensen <>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel incubating 4.1.0-RC1
Date Sun, 04 May 2014 06:53:13 GMT
In fact it would defeat the purpose if we add a license header to this file. It's a serialized
object graph from a previous version of MetaModel and it's purpose as a test-resource is to
test that we can deserialize legacy object graphs if needed (some MetaModel applications are
relying on that).

Best regards,

From: Henry Saputra []
Sent: 04 May 2014 02:20
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel incubating 4.1.0-RC1

Hi Justin,

We had this discussion before I think the conclusion is that as long as
long it is generated from internal source and not 3rd party it is allowed.
Someone else from IPMC could help clarifying this.

- Henry

On Saturday, May 3, 2014, Justin Mclean <> wrote:

> Hi,
> +0 (binding) if the binary file question (see below) can be answered I'd
> vote +1
> Signatures and hashes all good
> DISCLAIMER correct
> Filename contains "incubating"
> NOTICE and LICENCE good (note that the year is wrong)
> All source file have correct headers (there's a few .csv, .xml and .txt
> files without headers that you may want to fix in a later release)
> Can compile from source
> I did notice a couple of binary files in the release - there's no jars or
> the like and most seem to be excel test files or similar. But the following
> file looks like a serialised java class - is that allowed?
> MetaModel-4.1.0-RC1-incubating/core/src/test/resources/metamodel-3.0-default-row.ser
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:<javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail:<javascript:;>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message