From general-return-44367-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Mar 17 17:11:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D3C4CE95 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94872 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2014 17:11:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94338 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2014 17:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94330 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2014 17:11:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:11:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of john.d.ament@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:11:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wo20so5572183obc.8 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mCIaNuzjgQjQbRrHkvPd7TyWscRr/8EVVKdlTeNkbp8=; b=NWhpkZZDQuqc1dwVAIa6cQSODSGMgeQ9NrzBjt68OW/Dq6Ii5znJnp6RO1hakRh8Kq Vd+JKP0QbAmNKF6Qzgwp6c2yAUNrhpguknfrYIwg089QLQrFaHcAGxAX6rJKRdQMV0Kw nRHszC1Pof4Sv66qPN+pBxFDlbh4j/btrpY4osfLMsrFPLir+rZ+p3whfq8/TFy4xxDa xkdQCGWKmJsYomWxFo3Mprj020X1A9ZO9RF3ZTQsHLRBCgnAVbeMQ39s5rwHfldsIpMC L5JxTnZjKvhKHczL7kQKhXjj4iWCaPlDMoe9dwpzrap0lFKfnFO28WBWmCKLjW1/ttYD /XUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.250.200 with SMTP id ze8mr1675684obc.72.1395076242768; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.60.163 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:10:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Process question on release votes From: "John D. Ament" To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, While not specifically incubator related, was wondering if someone at the incubator may provide me some insight. Right now, release votes cannot be veto'd. This seems like an oversight IMHO. If a release candidate is visibly wrong (e.g. bad licenses, or something else), surely the release candidate can be veto'd no? John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org